BUSI 830 Week 6 (6.1)Discussion Thread: Solutions in the Multiple-Case Case Study

BUSI 830 Week 6 (6.1)Discussion Thread: Solutions in the Multiple-Case Case Study
 
Multiple-case case studies allow the researcher to use replication logic to evaluate the theoretical propositions and strengthen the findings of the studies. In this discussion, the example of a multiple-case study would be the culture of compliance to environmental regulations within investor-owned electrical utilities, local municipal electric utilities, and federal electrical utilities. The application of the same case study construct to the three distinct types of electrical utilities allows the researcher to show potential trends of similarity or differences. The researcher is then able to compare the trends and findings against the theoretical propositions to determine the validity of the study. The synthesizing of the data across three separate types of utilities allows the researcher to address outlier and rival explanations as a part of the research findings. As a consultant to the Kansas state leadership, the student will discuss what this Multiple-Case Case Study brings to bear on the source selection of the electricity provider for the state. The student must specifically speak to the application of a couple of business solutions (i.e. does this study identify a single solution or could it be parlayed into a range of solutions, do the outcomes of this study bring a scalable solution, what’s the difference between this and a simple business case analysis or cost benefit analysis, etc.)
 
Instructions
 
Minimum of 300 words in the body
Minimum of 2 sources from the literature in addition to course texts
 
Use the following outline:
 
Introduction
Consultant’s Assessment/Recommendations
Conclusion
References
 

In addition to the course textbook(s), this discussion must include at least 2 references from scholarly articles that have publication dates no older than 5 years. Do not use any books other than the Bible (if applicable) and the textbook. Do not conduct interviews.
In-text citations are required to support your statements, points, assertions, issues, arguments, concerns, paragraph topic sentences, and statements of fact and opinion. NOTE: In your reply post, when using/referring to a peer’s main thread, you must cite them.
The required cover page and the reference pages are not included in the required assignment word count but are required as part of your discussion post. 
The introduction and conclusion sections should be succinct.
Sources of information from Wikipedia, dictionaries, and encyclopedia will not be accepted.
All parts of the assignment must be based on scholarly and biblical literature. 
Avoid clichés, slang, jargon, exaggerations, abbreviations, figurative language, and language that is too informal and too subjective. 

 
Grading Metrics
 
Consult the accompanying rubric for how your instructor will grade this discussion. Also, any form of plagiarism, including cutting and pasting, will result in zero points for the entire discussion. All quoted and ‘directly influencing’ materials must be properly cited in current APA format.
 
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool. The tool is a starting point for instructors to check overall Academic Integrity and higher scores generally indicate a higher probability of Academic Misconduct. The higher a score, the higher the probability that there are too many quotations included in the narrative, and/or there are passages that have not been properly cited.
“96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us.”

"Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you with a guaranteed plagiarism-free A+ quality paper. Discount Code: SUPER50!"

order custom paper