[SOLVED] The historical and social setting of the text.

The historical and social setting of the text. Choose one of the following passages (or an alternative passage assigned or approved by your professor) and follow the steps of the exegetical process to complete a full exegesis that uses the feedback your instructor provided to you in the previous course assignments:Epistle: 1 Thessalonians 4:1-8 or Romans 3:21-26Gospel: John 11 or Matthew 19:1-12Gospel Parable: Luke 16:1-13 or Matthew 21:33-46New Testament Narrative: Acts 2:42-47 or Acts 17:16-34New Testament Apocalyptic: Revelation 2:1-7 or Revelation 22:1-5Old Testament Law: Deuteronomy 17:14-20 or Leviticus 4:1-12Old Testament Narrative: 2 Chronicles 23-24 or Genesis 12Old Testament Wisdom: Job 28 or Proverbs 26:4-5Old Testament Poetry: Psalm 23 or Psalm 72Old Testament Prophecy: Isaiah 6 or Ezekiel 8The entire paper will be 1,500-2000 words. Along with an introduction and a conclusion, be sure to accomplish the following:Text Analysis:Examine the features of the text that you have selected within its genre.Examine the historical and social setting of the text.Examine the text within its genre.Perform a word study of two or three important words within the text.Steps of the Interpretive Journey:Examine what the text meant to the original biblical audience.Examine the differences between the biblical audience and Christians today.Examine the theological principle(s) in this text.Examine how the theological principle(s) fit with the rest of the Bible.Examine how individual Christians today live out the principle(s).Along with the use of the Bible and textbook, use a minimum of four academic sources from the GCU Library.Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Passage Exegesis39 pointsCriteria DescriptionAll exegesis elements are fully developed to include sentence and paragraph analysis, word study, historical and sociological context examination, genre, and theological analysis.5. Target39 pointsExegesis is thorough, detailed, specific, and demonstrates a deep understanding of exegesis. All exegesis elements are fully developed to include sentence and paragraph analysis, word study, historical and sociological context examination, genre, and theological analysis.4. Acceptable33.15 pointsExegesis is thorough, detailed, and specific. All exegesis elements are fully developed to include sentence and paragraph analysis, word study, historical and sociological context examination, genre, and theological analysis.3. Approaching29.25 pointsExegesis is thorough and detailed. All exegesis elements are fully developed to include sentence and paragraph analysis, word study, historical and sociological context examination, genre, and theological analysis.2. Insufficient25.35 pointsExegesis lacks sufficient details. Exegesis elements are vaguely developed in sentence and paragraph analysis, word study, historical and sociological context examination, genre, or theological analysis.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsExegesis is insufficient or incorrect. Exegesis elements are incompletely or incorrectly developed in sentence and paragraph analysis, word study, historical and sociological context examination, genre, or theological analysis.collapse Steps of the Interpretive Journey assessmentSteps of the Interpretive Journey26 pointsCriteria DescriptionExamination of the passage meaning to the original biblical and contemporary audience and the theological principles in this text. Additional details, depth, and insight provide the reader greater insight and understanding into the selected passage.5. Target26 pointsExamination of the passage meaning to the original biblical audience, differences between the original and the contemporary audience, the theological principles in the text, and how the theological principles fit with the rest of the bible are clear and comprehensive. Additional details, depth, and insight provide the reader greater insight and understanding into the selected passage.4. Acceptable22.1 pointsExamination of the passage meaning to the original biblical audience, differences between the original and the contemporary audience, the theological principles in the text, and how the theological principles fit with the rest of the bible are clear and comprehensive.3. Approaching19.5 pointsExamination of the passage meaning to the original biblical audience, differences between the original and the contemporary audience, the theological principles in the text, and how the theological principles fit with the rest of the bible are clear.2. Insufficient16.9 pointsExamination of the passage meaning to the original biblical audience, differences between the original and the contemporary audience, the theological principles in the text, and how the theological principles fit with the rest of the bible are unclear.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsExamination of the passage meaning to the original biblical audience, differences between the original and the contemporary audience, the theological principles in the text, and how the theological principles fit with the rest of the bible are not present or are inadequate.collapse Application to the Individual Christian Life (B) assessmentApplication to the Individual Christian Life (B)13 pointsCriteria DescriptionExamination of how individual Christians today live out the theological principles in the selected text. Additional details, depth, and insight provide the reader greater insight and understanding into the selected passage. (C1.3)5. Target13 pointsExamination of how individual Christians today live out the theological principles in the selected text is clear and thorough. Additional details, depth, and insight provide the reader greater insight and understanding into the selected passage.4. Acceptable11.05 pointsExamination of how individual Christians today live out the theological principles in the selected text is clear and thorough.3. Approaching9.75 pointsExamination of how individual Christians today live out the theological principles in the selected text is clear.2. Insufficient8.45 pointsExamination of how individual Christians today live out the theological principles in the selected text is unclear or is vaguely connected to exegesis findings.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsExamination of how individual Christians today live out the theological principles in the selected text is inadequate or is unconnected to exegesis findings.collapse Integration of Instructor Feedback assessmentIntegration of Instructor Feedback13 pointsCriteria DescriptionIntegration of instructor feedback. It is seamlessly incorporated into the flow of the paper. All instructor comments and suggestions are addressed.5. Target13 pointsIntegration of instructor feedback is evident and meaningful. It is seamlessly incorporated into the flow of the paper. All instructor comments and suggestions are addressed.4. Acceptable11.05 pointsIntegration of instructor feedback is evident and relatively well incorporated into the natural flow of the paper. All instructor comments and suggestions are addressed.3. Approaching9.75 pointsIntegration of instructor feedback is evident, though it appears as a disjointed, cursory addition. Most of the instructor comments and suggestions are addressed.2. Insufficient8.45 pointsIntegration of instructor feedback is vaguely attempted but does not address most instructor comments and suggestions.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsIntegration of instructor feedback is either missing or not evident.collapse Thesis, Position, or Purpose assessmentThesis, Position, or Purpose9.1 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.5. Target9.1 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.4. Acceptable7.73 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is adequately presented. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.3. Approaching6.82 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.2. Insufficient5.92 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is unfocused or confused. There is very little awareness of the intended audience.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.collapse Development, Structure, and Conclusion assessmentDevelopment, Structure, and Conclusion9.1 pointsCriteria DescriptionAdvances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.5. Target9.1 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and logical conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.4. Acceptable7.73 pointsThe thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.3. Approaching6.82 pointsLimited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.2. Insufficient5.92 pointsWriting lacks logical progression of the thesis, position, or purpose. Some organization is attempted, but ideas are disconnected. Conclusion is unclear and not supported by the overall development of the purpose.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsNo advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.collapse Evidence assessmentEvidence7.8 pointsCriteria DescriptionSelects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.5. Target7.8 pointsSpecific and appropriate evidence is included. Relevant perspectives of others are clearly considered.4. Acceptable6.63 pointsRelevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.3. Approaching5.85 pointsEvidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.2. Insufficient5.07 pointsEvidence is limited or irrelevant. The interpretation of other perspectives is superficial or incorrect.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsEvidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.collapse Mechanics of Writing assessmentMechanics of Writing7.8 pointsCriteria DescriptionIncludes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.5. Target7.8 pointsNo mechanical errors are present. Appropriate language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.4. Acceptable6.63 pointsFew mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.3. Approaching5.85 pointsOccasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.2. Insufficient5.07 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsErrors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.collapse Format/Documentation assessmentFormat/Documentation5.2 pointsCriteria DescriptionUses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.5. Target5.2 pointsNo errors in formatting or documentation are present.4. Acceptable4.42 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.3. Approaching3.9 pointsAppropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.2. Insufficient3.38 pointsAppropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.1. Unsatisfactory0 pointsAppropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

Save your time – order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines

Order Paper Now

the historical and social setting of the text. the historical and social setting of the text. the historical and social setting of the text. the historical and social setting of the text. the historical and social setting of the text.

Are you overwhelmed by your class schedule and need help completing this assignment? You deserve the best professional and plagiarism-free writing services. Allow us to take the weight off your shoulders by clicking this button.
Get help

"Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you with a guaranteed plagiarism-free A+ quality paper. Discount Code: SUPER50!"

order custom paper